Esports Charts Brand Score: 61/100 - Developing tier

Esports Viewership, Popularity and Analytics

Esports Charts (escharts.com) earns a Brand Analyzer score of 61 out of 100, placing it in the Developing tier among Media & Entertainment brands, Technology brands. Among 2070 Media & Entertainment brands analyzed, Esports Charts ranks in the 25th percentile (category average 69, leader 97). The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark. Dimension scores: Name Quality 70/100, Digital Presence 65/100, Visual Identity 75/100, Messaging Clarity 95/100, Trust Foundation 47/100, AI Discoverability 49/100, Brand Authority 45/100.

AI Snapshot

Esports Charts (escharts.com) is an analytics platform focused on esports viewership and event popularity data. Its stated mission is to make esports transparent by helping sponsors, organizers, and viewers discover the popularity level of any live or recorded esports event. The platform provides comprehensive metrics on event performance, positioning itself as a leading source of esports viewership analytics for stakeholders across the esports industry.

Key facts about Esports Charts
Brand NameEsports Charts
Domainescharts.com
IndustryMedia & Entertainment, Technology
Main CompetitorsStream Hatchet, Newzoo, Sullygnome, Twitch Tracker, Nielsen Esports (97/100)

Evidence

Moz Domain Authority 64/100 vs category average 41 / leader 100 - a strong backlink profile, so AI systems frequently encounter mentions of the brand.

Ranked #29,151 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - strong traffic reinforces the brand's prominence to AI models.

No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.

The homepage meta description reads "Our website stores cookies on your computer. By continuing to browse the website, you explicitly accept the use of cookies. Learn more" (Meta description: 22 words (ideal length). OG description present and descriptive) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.

Structured data on the homepage: og:title, og:description. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.

AI-crawler access: No robots.txt found (default: all bots allowed, but explicit file preferred) - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.

Social footprint: verified profiles on Instagram; no detected presence on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, GitHub - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.

0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.

Score breakdown - 7 dimensions

AI visibility

Esports Charts scores 27/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.

Esports Charts has a weak AI-visibility profile at 27/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (47/100) and its weakest is visibility (10/100). It benefits from a global traffic rank of #29,151 (Tranco), a Moz Domain Authority of 64/100 and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, no strong Wikidata entry and thin schema.org structured data.

Visibility - 10/100

Trust - 37/100

Recommendation likelihood - 47/100

People Also Ask About Esports Charts

Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.

Who are Esports Charts's main competitors?

Esports Charts's main competitors include Stream Hatchet, Newzoo, Sullygnome, Twitch Tracker, Nielsen Esports (97/100). These companies compete in the Media & Entertainment space for similar customers, offering comparable products or services.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

Esports Charts vs Nielsen Esports: how do they compare?

Esports Charts and Nielsen Esports are competitors in Media & Entertainment. Brand Analyzer scores Esports Charts at 61/100 and Nielsen Esports at 97/100. They target overlapping audiences; the right choice depends on your specific needs and priorities.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

What are the best alternatives to Esports Charts?

Popular alternatives to Esports Charts include Stream Hatchet, Newzoo, Sullygnome, Twitch Tracker, Nielsen Esports (97/100). Each is an established option in the Media & Entertainment space; the best fit depends on your specific needs, budget, and required features.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

What is Esports Charts?

Esports Charts is an analytics platform available at escharts.com that specializes in esports viewership and event popularity data. It positions itself as a leading platform for esports popularity data and analytics, operating within the Media & Entertainment and Technology categories. Its mission centers on making esports transparent by providing accessible, data-driven insights about the reach and performance of esports events.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

What does Esports Charts do?

Esports Charts provides comprehensive analytics on esports viewership and event popularity. It enables stakeholders - including sponsors, organizers, teams, and viewers - to discover performance metrics for live and recorded esports events. By aggregating and presenting this data transparently, the platform allows users to evaluate and compare the popularity and reach of esports competitions and broadcasts.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

Does ChatGPT recommend Esports Charts?

Esports Charts scores 47/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Media & Entertainment options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

What products or services does Esports Charts offer?

Based on the available facts, Esports Charts offers an analytics platform that provides viewership data and popularity metrics for esports events. Its services are designed to help sponsors, organizers, teams, and viewers discover and evaluate the performance of live and recorded esports events. Specific product names, tiers, or pricing structures are not detailed in the provided information.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

Who uses Esports Charts?

Esports Charts is used by sponsors, organizers, teams, and viewers within the esports industry. Sponsors can evaluate event popularity to inform partnership and advertising decisions. Event organizers can assess the reach and performance of their broadcasts. Teams may use the data to demonstrate their audience value, while general viewers can explore viewership statistics for esports events they follow.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

What is Esports Charts known for?

Esports Charts is known for making esports transparent through viewership data and popularity metrics. It is recognized as a leading platform for tracking and reporting on the audience size and performance of esports events. Sponsors, organizers, and viewers rely on it to assess the reach and popularity level of any live or recorded esports event.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

How can Esports Charts improve its AI discoverability?

Esports Charts can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.

Sources: Esports Charts official site

Recommendations

Peer brands

Ranked closest to Esports Charts: Encoda (61/100), EasyMood Life (61/100), Eved (61/100), EventMakers (61/100).

A step up - brands to learn from: Vgames (71/100), VerradoWay (71/100).

Category leader: Boston.com (97/100).