Find it Here
Interm (interm.us) earns a Brand Analyzer score of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Developing tier among E-commerce brands, SaaS brands. Among 2261 E-commerce brands analyzed, Interm ranks in the 25th percentile (category average 68, leader 97). The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark. Dimension scores: Name Quality 100/100, Digital Presence 82/100, Visual Identity 89/100, Messaging Clarity 93/100, Trust Foundation 35/100, AI Discoverability 35/100, Brand Authority 25/100.
Interm (interm.us) is a platform operating in the E-commerce and SaaS categories that aims to help users find products, services, or information quickly. Its value proposition centers on providing a centralized destination where searches are simplified in one place. The platform targets everyday users who need quick access to items or services. No information is publicly available regarding its founding date, headquarters, parent company, or leadership.
| Brand Name | Interm |
|---|---|
| Domain | interm.us |
| Industry | E-commerce, SaaS |
| Main Competitors | Atom (97/100), Booking.com (97/100), LEGO (97/100), Logitech (97/100), Target (96/100) |
Moz Domain Authority 1/100 vs category average 29 / leader 95 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "Interm helps users find what they need effortlessly." (No meta description) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: No structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: No robots.txt found (default: all bots allowed, but explicit file preferred) - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Social footprint: verified profiles on LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, GitHub; no detected presence on X (Twitter), Facebook - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Interm scores 22/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Interm has a weak AI-visibility profile at 22/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (47/100) and its weakest is trust (7/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, a low Moz Domain Authority of 1/100 and thin schema.org structured data.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Interm and Atom are competitors in E-commerce. Brand Analyzer scores Interm at 62/100 and Atom at 97/100. They target overlapping audiences; the right choice depends on your specific needs and priorities.
Sources: Interm official site
Interm's closest peers in the E-commerce category include Atom (97/100), Booking.com (97/100), LEGO (97/100), Logitech (97/100), Target (96/100). These brands compete on similar audiences and were analyzed alongside Interm by Brand Analyzer.
Sources: Interm official site
Interm has low AI-search visibility, scoring 22/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 17, trust 7, recommendation 47). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Interm official site
Common alternatives to Interm include Atom (97/100), Booking.com (97/100), LEGO (97/100), Logitech (97/100), Target (96/100). Each is a peer brand in the same category; compare their brand and AI-visibility scores on Brand Analyzer to choose the best fit.
Sources: Interm official site
Interm scores 47/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest E-commerce options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: Interm official site
Interm can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Interm official site
Ranked closest to Interm: Il Letargo Del Riccio (62/100), HrvatskoWear (62/100), JawFit™ (62/100), kickstale (62/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: ZyG (71/100), Yammak (71/100).
Category leader: Atom (97/100).