Sustainable spending made easy
Commons (thecommons.earth) earns a Brand Analyzer score of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Brand-Ready tier among SaaS brands, Technology brands. Among 12358 SaaS brands analyzed, Commons ranks in the 81st percentile (category average 69, leader 97). The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark. Dimension scores: Name Quality 93/100, Digital Presence 82/100, Visual Identity 90/100, Messaging Clarity 95/100, Trust Foundation 79/100, AI Discoverability 83/100, Brand Authority 32/100.
Commons (thecommons.earth) is a mobile application focused on sustainable spending. It empowers users to turn everyday purchases into opportunities for climate action by combining spend tracking, expert brand ratings, and rewards in a single app. The platform aims to help environmentally conscious consumers align their spending with their climate values, save money, and avoid overconsumption and harmful brands.
| Brand Name | Commons |
|---|---|
| Domain | thecommons.earth |
| Industry | SaaS, Technology |
| Founded | 2004 |
| Parent Company / Owner | Wikimedia Foundation |
| Main Competitors | Aspiration, Doconomy, Sustainably, Greenly, Klima |
Moz Domain Authority 34/100 vs category average 28 / leader 99 - a strong backlink profile, so AI systems frequently encounter mentions of the brand.
Ranked #1,270,701 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - modest traffic makes the brand easy for AI models to overlook.
Commons appears on Wikipedia but without a dedicated company entity, so AI models can confuse it with similarly named subjects.
The homepage meta description reads "Sustainable spending made easy. Download the Commons mobile app to turn every purchase into an opportunity for climate action." (Meta description: 19 words (ideal length). OG description present and descriptive) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: 1 JSON-LD block(s), Breadcrumb/Website schema, og:title, og:description, og:image, og:type, Twitter cards, canonical. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Social footprint: verified profiles on Instagram, LinkedIn, YouTube, GitHub; no detected presence on Facebook, X (Twitter) - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Commons scores 39/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Commons has a weak AI-visibility profile at 39/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (53/100) and its weakest is trust (33/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry, a global traffic rank of #1,270,701 (Tranco) and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, a low Moz Domain Authority of 34/100 and thin schema.org structured data.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Commons's main competitors include Aspiration, Doconomy, Sustainably, Greenly, Klima. These companies compete in the SaaS space for similar customers, offering comparable products or services.
Sources: Commons official site
Popular alternatives to Commons include Aspiration, Doconomy, Sustainably, Greenly, Klima. Each is an established option in the SaaS space; the best fit depends on your specific needs, budget, and required features.
Sources: Commons official site
Commons has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 39/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 35, trust 33, recommendation 53). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Commons official site
Commons was founded in 2004. Commons operates in the SaaS category. It is analyzed by Brand Analyzer across seven brand dimensions and AI-search visibility.
Sources: Wikidata
Commons offers a mobile application available for download. Within the app, the core services include spend tracking, which allows users to monitor their purchases; expert brand ratings, which provide transparency on the sustainability credentials of brands; and a rewards system that incentivizes climate-conscious spending. The platform is categorized under SaaS and Technology, indicating a software-as-a-service delivery model.
Sources: Commons official site
Commons and Aspiration are competitors in SaaS. They target overlapping audiences; the right choice depends on your specific needs and priorities.
Sources: Commons official site
Commons scores 53/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is reasonably likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest SaaS options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority; a Wikipedia presence helps.
Sources: Commons official site
Commons (thecommons.earth) is a mobile application designed to make sustainable spending easy. It is positioned as a lifestyle app that combines financial spend tracking, expert brand ratings, and climate-focused rewards in one platform. Its stated mission is to empower people to turn every purchase into an opportunity for climate action, helping users align their daily financial decisions with their environmental values.
Sources: Commons official site
Commons connects spend tracking, expert brand ratings, and rewards in a single mobile app. Users can monitor their purchases, receive ratings on brands based on sustainability criteria, and earn rewards for making climate-conscious spending decisions. The app is designed to help users save money, avoid overconsumption, and steer clear of brands considered harmful to the environment, effectively turning routine financial activity into climate action.
Sources: Commons official site
Commons can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Commons official site
According to the known facts, Commons targets environmentally conscious consumers who want to align their spending habits with their climate values. Its intended user base includes individuals who are motivated to avoid overconsumption, steer clear of harmful brands, and save money - all while making a positive environmental impact through their everyday purchasing decisions.
Sources: Commons official site
Commons is owned by or part of Wikimedia Foundation. Commons operates in the SaaS category.
Sources: Wikidata
Commons is known for making sustainable spending effortless by integrating financial tracking with brand transparency and feel-good rewards. It is specifically recognized for its approach of turning everyday consumer purchases into opportunities for climate action, and for providing users with expert-rated information on brands to help them make more environmentally responsible choices without sacrificing convenience.
Sources: Commons official site
Ranked closest to Commons: Testsigma (75/100), Tesorio (75/100), theCut (75/100), Thndr (75/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Zyte (81/100), Zipline (81/100).
Category leader: Accenture (97/100).