病院口コミ・ランキング検索サイト
カルー (Caloo) (caloo.jp) scores 66 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Developing tier among Healthcare brands, Media & Entertainment brands, in the 13th percentile of 16268 Healthcare brands.
カルー (Caloo) is a city of the Philippines in Metro Manila. It was founded in 1815. 全国の病院・クリニック・歯科の口コミや評判、治療実績を通じて、利用者が最適な医療機関を見つけられるようにする。.
| Brand Name | カルー (Caloo) |
|---|---|
| Domain | caloo.jp |
| Industry | Healthcare, Media & Entertainment |
| Founded | 1815 |
| Main Competitors | Caremo (66/100), EPARK (73/100), QLife (70/100), 病院なび (49/100), Doctors File (67/100) |
Moz Domain Authority 41/100 vs category average 40 / leader 95 - a strong backlink profile, so AI systems frequently encounter mentions of the brand.
Ranked #52,937 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - strong traffic reinforces the brand's prominence to AI models.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "病院口コミ、病院検索、病院ランキングなら、病院口コミ検索カルー。全国の病院、クリニック、歯科を口コミ、評判、治療実績・手術件数から探せます。さらに専門医・専門外来・女医など多様な検索も可能です。病院口コミ検索カルーでおすすめの病院を見つけませんか?" (Meta description too short (1 words). OG description present but brief) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: 2 JSON-LD block(s), Breadcrumb/Website schema, og:title, og:description, og:image, og:type, Twitter cards, canonical. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt mentions ClaudeBot - all allowed - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Content is JA-only, limiting citation in English-language AI answers.
Detected tech stack: PHP, Nginx.
Social footprint: verified profiles on Instagram, GitHub; no detected presence on Facebook, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, YouTube - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.
When asked "What is カルー (Caloo)?", Claude could identify the brand as of October 2026. Caloo(カルー)は日本の病院・クリニック検索口コミサイトで、全国の医療機関の情報や患者によるレビューを掲載し、ユーザーが症状や地域から医療機関を探せるサービスを提供しています。 Best known for 日本国内の病院・クリニックの検索と口コミ評価サイト.
When asked "Best brands similar to カルー (Caloo)?", Claude would recommend カルー (Caloo) as of October 2026. 日本のヘルスケア関連で病院検索・口コミサービスを紹介する際に、代表的なプレイヤーの一つとして挙がる知名度がある。
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
カルー (Caloo)'s main competitors in Healthcare: Caremo (66/100), EPARK (73/100), QLife (70/100), 病院なび (49/100), Doctors File (67/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
カルー (Caloo) has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 38/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 27, trust 40, recommendation 56). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: カルー (Caloo) official site
カルー (Caloo) was founded in 1815. カルー (Caloo) operates in the Healthcare category. It is analyzed by Brand Analyzer across seven brand dimensions and AI-search visibility.
Sources: Wikidata
カルー (Caloo) は、全国の病院、クリニック、歯科医院に関する口コミ・評判情報、治療実績・手術件数データ、専門医・専門外来・女医の有無などの検索機能を提供するウェブサービスである。
Sources: カルー (Caloo) official site
カルー (Caloo) scores 56/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is reasonably likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Healthcare options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: カルー (Caloo) official site
カルー (Caloo) can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: カルー (Caloo) official site
カルー (Caloo) scores 38/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
カルー (Caloo) has a weak AI-visibility profile at 38/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (56/100) and its weakest is visibility (27/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry, a global traffic rank of #52,937 (Tranco) and a Moz Domain Authority of 41/100. The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, thin schema.org structured data and no llms.txt to steer AI to its best pages. In a live check, Claude could already identify カルー (Caloo) from memory (October 2026) - a sign these signals are paying off.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to カルー (Caloo): BVAEB (66/100), British Thyroid Association (66/100), Carecenta (66/100), CareConnect (66/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Zentralwohlfahrtsstelle der Juden in Deutschland e.V. (71/100), ZT Corporate (71/100).
Category leader: Booksy (96/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.