Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine Brand Score: 68/100 - Developing tier

Advancing the history of science together

Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine (chstm.org) scores 68 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Developing tier among Education brands, Non-profit brands, in the 24th percentile of 36491 Education brands.

AI Snapshot

The Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine is a non-profit organization based in Philadelphia, United States, founded in 2007. It supports and promotes scholarship, education, and community engagement in the history of science, technology, and medicine by uniting scholars, institutions, and resources to foster interdisciplinary research and collaboration. The organization serves as a network hub for historians, researchers, educators, and students, as well as affiliated academic and cultural institutions, facilitating scholarly exchange and professional development in these fields.

Key facts about Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine
Brand NameConsortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine
Domainchstm.org
IndustryEducation, Non-profit
Founded2007
HeadquartersPhiladelphia, United States
Main CompetitorsHistory of Science Society (69/100), Society for the History of Technology (72/100), American Association for the History of Medicine (82/100), British Society for the History of Science (64/100), Philosophy of Science Association (75/100)

Evidence

Moz Domain Authority 40/100 vs category average 45 / leader 97 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.

Ranked #1,523,164 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - modest traffic makes the brand easy for AI models to overlook.

No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.

The homepage meta description reads "To support and promote scholarship, education, and community engagement in the history of science, technology, and medicine." (No meta description) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.

Structured data on the homepage: canonical. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.

AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.

Detected tech stack: Nginx, Drupal.

Social footprint: verified profiles on YouTube, X (Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, GitHub; no detected presence on LinkedIn - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.

0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.

Does AI know Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine?

Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.

When asked "What is Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine?", Claude could identify the brand as of October 2026. The Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine is a UK-based organization that supports research, teaching, and public engagement in the history of science, technology, and medicine, often in connection with institutions like the Science Museum and various univers Best known for Coordinating fellowships, research resources, and networking for historians of science, technology, and medicine.

When asked "Best brands similar to Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine?", Claude would recommend Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine as of October 2026. It's a well-regarded hub for scholars and institutions in this specific academic niche, so I'd mention it if someone asked about organizations supporting history of science research.

People Also Ask About Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine

Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.

Who are Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine's main competitors?

Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine's main competitors in Education: History of Science Society (69/100), Society for the History of Technology (72/100), American Association for the History of Medicine (82/100), British Society for the History of Science (64/100), Philosophy of Science Association (75/100).

Sources: Brand Analyzer scan

What is Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine?

The Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine is a non-profit organization based in Philadelphia, United States, founded in 2007. It is a network of scholars and institutions dedicated to supporting and promoting scholarship, education, and community engagement in the history of science, technology, and medicine.

Sources: Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine official site

How visible is Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine in AI search?

Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 30/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 21, trust 22, recommendation 56). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.

Sources: Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine official site

When was Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine founded?

Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine was founded in 2007. Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine operates in the Education category. It is analyzed by Brand Analyzer across seven brand dimensions and AI-search visibility.

Sources: Wikidata

Does ChatGPT recommend Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine?

Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine scores 56/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is reasonably likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Education options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.

Sources: Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine official site

How can Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine improve its AI discoverability?

Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.

Sources: Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine official site

Who uses Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine?

The Consortium is used by historians, researchers, educators, and students focused on the history of science, technology, and medicine, as well as by affiliated academic and cultural institutions seeking collaboration and professional development opportunities in this field.

Sources: Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine official site

Recommendations

AI visibility

Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine scores 30/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.

Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine has a weak AI-visibility profile at 30/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (56/100) and its weakest is visibility (21/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry, a global traffic rank of #1,523,164 (Tranco) and a Moz Domain Authority of 40/100. The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, thin schema.org structured data and no llms.txt to steer AI to its best pages. In a live check, Claude could already identify Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine from memory (October 2026) - a sign these signals are paying off.

Visibility - 21/100

Trust - 22/100

Recommendation likelihood - 56/100

Score breakdown - 7 dimensions

The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.

Peer brands

Ranked closest to Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine: Christophe Michalak (68/100), Choices (68/100), Columbia International College (CIC) (68/100), Citadelles & Mazenod (68/100).

A step up - brands to learn from: 作业帮 (Zuoyebang) (71/100), Zentralwohlfahrtsstelle der Juden in Deutschland e.V. (71/100).

Category leader: Canva (97/100).

Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.

Add this brand score badge to your site