Independent cybersecurity testing you can trust
CyberRatings.org (cyberratings.org) scores 75 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Brand-Ready tier among Technology brands, SaaS brands, in the 42nd percentile of 52810 Technology brands.
CyberRatings.org is an independent organization that provides no-cost, third-party test reports evaluating the real-world effectiveness of cybersecurity products, such as firewalls. It aims to help organizations move beyond vendor marketing claims by offering transparent, rigorous performance data. Its target audience includes IT security professionals, enterprise decision-makers, and organizations seeking to select effective security solutions. The organization positions itself as a trusted authority in cybersecurity product testing within the broader technology and SaaS categories.
| Brand Name | CyberRatings.org |
|---|---|
| Domain | cyberratings.org |
| Industry | Technology, SaaS |
| Main Competitors | AV-TEST (88/100), AV-Comparatives (86/100), SE Labs (82/100), ICSA Labs (61/100), MITRE Engenuity (46/100), NSS Labs (84/100) |
Moz Domain Authority 31/100 vs category average 39 / leader 100 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "CyberRatings.org delivers independent, no-cost cybersecurity test reports and helps organizations assess real-world protection effectiveness." (Meta description: 14 words (ideal length). OG description present and descriptive) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: 1 JSON-LD block(s), Organization schema, Breadcrumb/Website schema, og:title, og:description, og:type, Twitter cards, canonical. Adding FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: Cloudflare, WordPress, Ghost, HubSpot.
Social footprint: verified profiles on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, GitHub; no detected presence on YouTube - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.
When asked "What is CyberRatings.org?", Claude could identify the brand as of October 2026. CyberRatings.org is a nonprofit organization that provides independent, rigorous testing and ratings of cybersecurity products, similar in spirit to how Consumer Reports or crash-test ratings work for other industries. It tests products like firewalls, endpoint protection, and em Best known for Independent, lab-based testing and ratings of network security and cybersecurity products.
When asked "Best brands similar to CyberRatings.org?", Claude would recommend CyberRatings.org as of October 2026. It's a well-regarded, independent source for cybersecurity product testing that security professionals often reference when evaluating vendors.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
CyberRatings.org's main competitors in Technology: AV-TEST (88/100), AV-Comparatives (86/100), SE Labs (82/100), ICSA Labs (61/100), MITRE Engenuity (46/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
CyberRatings.org has low AI-search visibility, scoring 22/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 0, trust 36, recommendation 45). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: CyberRatings.org official site
CyberRatings.org scores 45/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Technology options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: CyberRatings.org official site
CyberRatings.org is an independent, nonprofit-style organization that conducts and publishes no-cost cybersecurity test reports. It evaluates the real-world effectiveness of security products, such as firewalls, to help organizations make informed purchasing and deployment decisions based on objective data rather than vendor marketing claims.
Sources: CyberRatings.org official site
CyberRatings.org performs independent, rigorous third-party testing of cybersecurity products, including firewalls, to measure their real-world protection effectiveness. It then publishes these findings as free, publicly accessible test reports, enabling IT security professionals and enterprises to compare products and evaluate claims made by vendors against unbiased performance data.
Sources: CyberRatings.org official site
CyberRatings.org can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: CyberRatings.org official site
CyberRatings.org offers independent test reports evaluating cybersecurity products, with a specific focus mentioned on firewalls. These reports assess real-world protection effectiveness and are provided at no cost, serving as a resource for organizations comparing security solutions.
Sources: CyberRatings.org official site
CyberRatings.org is known for providing independent, no-cost test reports that assess the real-world effectiveness of cybersecurity products like firewalls. Its reputation rests on offering unbiased, rigorous evaluations that cut through vendor marketing claims, giving organizations objective data to guide security product selection.
Sources: CyberRatings.org official site
CyberRatings.org is used by IT security professionals, enterprise decision-makers, and organizations that need to evaluate and select effective cybersecurity solutions, such as firewalls. These users rely on its independent test reports to make informed decisions grounded in real-world effectiveness data rather than vendor claims.
Sources: CyberRatings.org official site
CyberRatings.org scores 22/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
CyberRatings.org has a weak AI-visibility profile at 22/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (45/100) and its weakest is visibility (0/100). It benefits from open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.) and machine-readable schema.org markup. The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, no strong Wikidata entry and a low Moz Domain Authority of 31/100. In a live check, Claude could already identify CyberRatings.org from memory (October 2026) - a sign these signals are paying off.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to CyberRatings.org: CyberMSI (75/100), CyberGate (75/100), N2K Networks (75/100), Cycuity (75/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Zymo Research (81/100), Zurich Italia (81/100).
Category leader: Hostinger (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.