Studio of re-enchantment
MakeMake (elastic.tv) scores 82 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Strong Brand tier among Media & Entertainment brands, Marketing & Advertising brands, in the 67th percentile of 8938 Media & Entertainment brands.
MakeMake is a creative studio, associated with elastic.tv, that produces stories for entertainment and advertising. Its stated mission is to make stories that re-enchant audiences, combining creative storytelling with production expertise. The studio has worked with major clients such as Netflix and Amazon Music, positioning itself within the media, entertainment, and advertising sectors as a provider of high-quality visual storytelling and production services to brands and agencies.
| Brand Name | MakeMake |
|---|---|
| Domain | elastic.tv |
| Industry | Media & Entertainment, Marketing & Advertising |
| Parent Company / Owner | Elastic |
| Main Competitors | Elastic (82/100), Buck (83/100), Psyop (75/100), The Mill (88/100), Blind, Gentleman Scholar, Ntropic (71/100) |
Moz Domain Authority 51/100 vs category average 54 / leader 100 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "MakeMake, studio of re-enchantment, makemakes stories in entertainment and advertising." (Meta description: 10 words (ideal length). OG description present and descriptive) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: og:title, og:description, og:image, og:type. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: No robots.txt found (default: all bots allowed, but explicit file preferred) - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: WordPress, Ghost, Vue.
Social footprint: verified profiles on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, GitHub; no detected presence on Facebook - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked September 2026.
When asked "What is MakeMake?", Claude could not identify the brand as of September 2026. I don't genuinely recognize a company called MakeMake associated with the domain elastic.tv, likely because it's a small or niche media/entertainment player without much presence in my training data.
When asked "Best brands similar to MakeMake?", Claude would not surface MakeMake as of September 2026. I can't recommend a company I don't have verified information about.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
MakeMake's main competitors in Media & Entertainment: Elastic (82/100), Buck (83/100), Psyop (75/100), The Mill (88/100), Ntropic (71/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
MakeMake has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 27/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 17, trust 29, recommendation 42). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: MakeMake official site
MakeMake scores 42/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Media & Entertainment options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: MakeMake official site
MakeMake can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: MakeMake official site
MakeMake scores 27/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
MakeMake has a weak AI-visibility profile at 27/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (42/100) and its weakest is visibility (17/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry, a Moz Domain Authority of 51/100 and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, thin schema.org structured data and no llms.txt to steer AI to its best pages. In a live check (September 2026), Claude could not identify MakeMake from memory, confirming the gaps above.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to MakeMake: EIN Presswire (82/100), Dwell (82/100), Emerald Chat (82/100), Emerald (82/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Yr (91/100), Yamaha Corporation (91/100).
Category leader: Complex (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.