Reputation for machines
Rated (rated.network) scores 76 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Brand-Ready tier among Technology brands, Finance brands, SaaS brands, in the 47th percentile of 53587 Technology brands.
Rated (rated.network) is a technology company that provides independent, third-party ratings of nodes and node operators on proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain networks such as Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche. It builds data pipelines and maintains an infrastructure dataset used to evaluate validator performance. Rated's stated mission is to keep the world's machines aligned and accountable, positioning itself as a trusted, independent authority for staking infrastructure performance data, serving validators, institutional stakers, developers, and other PoS network participants.
| Brand Name | Rated |
|---|---|
| Domain | rated.network |
| Industry | Technology, Finance |
| Main Competitors | Staking Rewards (79/100), Nansen (83/100), Dune Analytics (68/100), Blockdaemon (82/100), Figment (89/100), Beaconcha.in |
Moz Domain Authority 32/100 vs category average 39 / leader 100 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
Ranked #1,480,227 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - modest traffic makes the brand easy for AI models to overlook.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "Rated offers independent, third-party node and node operator ratings, robust data pipelines and the most comprehensive infrastructure dataset, for PoS networks such as Ethereum and…" (Meta description: 26 words (ideal length). No OG description (falling back to meta)) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: og:image. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: Next.js, Cloudflare.
Social footprint: verified profiles on GitHub, X (Twitter), Facebook, Instagram; no detected presence on LinkedIn, YouTube - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.
When asked "What is Rated?", Claude could identify the brand as of October 2026. Rated is a data and analytics platform that provides performance ratings and metrics for Ethereum validators and node operators, helping stakers and the broader ecosystem assess validator reliability and effectiveness. Best known for Validator performance ratings and analytics for Ethereum staking.
When asked "Best brands similar to Rated?", Claude would recommend Rated as of October 2026. It's a recognized tool in the Ethereum staking space for transparency around validator and node operator performance, so it would come up in discussions of staking analytics tools.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Rated's main competitors in Technology: Staking Rewards (79/100), Nansen (83/100), Dune Analytics (68/100), Blockdaemon (82/100), Figment (89/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
Rated has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 28/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 17, trust 22, recommendation 53). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Rated official site
Rated offers independent, third-party ratings of nodes and node operators on proof-of-stake networks, along with data pipelines and an infrastructure dataset covering networks such as Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche. These offerings are designed to help users track, benchmark, and build applications based on staking infrastructure performance.
Sources: Rated official site
Rated scores 53/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is reasonably likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Technology options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: Rated official site
Rated is a technology company that provides independent, third-party ratings of nodes and node operators on proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain networks, including Ethereum and Solana.
Sources: Rated official site
Rated collects and analyzes infrastructure data to produce independent ratings of validators and node operators on PoS networks. It builds robust data pipelines and maintains a comprehensive infrastructure dataset that tracks node performance, helping stakeholders assess reliability and performance across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche.
Sources: Rated official site
Rated can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Rated official site
Rated is used by validators, node operators, institutional stakers, developers, and organizations participating in proof-of-stake blockchain networks such as Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche.
Sources: Rated official site
Rated is known for offering independent, third-party node and node operator ratings backed by one of the most comprehensive infrastructure datasets for proof-of-stake networks such as Ethereum and Solana.
Sources: Rated official site
Rated scores 28/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Rated has a weak AI-visibility profile at 28/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (53/100) and its weakest is visibility (17/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry, a global traffic rank of #1,480,227 (Tranco) and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, a low Moz Domain Authority of 32/100 and thin schema.org structured data. In a live check, Claude could already identify Rated from memory (October 2026) - a sign these signals are paying off.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to Rated: Rapiscan Systems (76/100), RapidView IBAK North America (76/100), RTX (76/100), R&D World (76/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Zymo Research (81/100), Zurich Italia (81/100).
Category leader: Hostinger (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.