Tracking retractions as a window
Retraction Watch (retractionwatch.com) scores 87 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Strong Brand tier among Media & Entertainment brands, Education brands, Other brands, in the 86th percentile of 9579 Media & Entertainment brands.
Retraction Watch is a website launched in 2012 that tracks and reports retractions of scientific papers, aiming to illuminate issues of research integrity and misconduct. Operated by the Center for Scientific Integrity, it maintains a continuously updated database of retracted studies alongside news articles analyzing the causes and implications of these retractions. The site serves researchers, journalists, publishers, and the public interested in accountability within scientific publishing.
| Brand Name | Retraction Watch |
|---|---|
| Domain | retractionwatch.com |
| Industry | Media & Entertainment, Education |
| Founded | 2012 |
| Parent Company / Owner | Center for Scientific Integrity |
| Main Competitors | PubPeer, For Better Science, Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (80/100), Science Integrity Digest |
Moz Domain Authority 80/100 vs category average 54 / leader 100 - a strong backlink profile, so AI systems frequently encounter mentions of the brand.
Ranked #43,780 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - strong traffic reinforces the brand's prominence to AI models.
Retraction Watch has a dedicated Wikipedia entity - a top-weighted signal AI models rely on to identify and describe the brand.
The homepage meta description reads "Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process" (Meta description: 9 words. OG description present and descriptive) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: og:title, og:description, og:image, og:type. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: Cloudflare, WordPress, Ghost.
Social footprint: verified profiles on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram; no detected presence on YouTube, GitHub - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked September 2026.
When asked "What is Retraction Watch?", Claude could identify the brand as of September 2026. Retraction Watch is a blog launched in 2010 by Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus that tracks and reports on scientific paper retractions, correcting the scientific record and highlighting research misconduct and fraud. Best known for Cataloguing and reporting on retracted scientific papers, including maintaining a large public database of retractions.
When asked "Best brands similar to Retraction Watch?", Claude would recommend Retraction Watch as of September 2026. It's the leading and most well-known outlet dedicated specifically to tracking scientific retractions and research integrity issues.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Retraction Watch offers a continuously updated database of scientific paper retractions searchable by author, journal, subject, and reason for retraction. It also provides news articles, investigative reports, and analysis covering research misconduct, publishing errors, and integrity issues in academia.
Sources: Retraction Watch official site
Retraction Watch is an independent website and database, founded in 2012 and operated by the Center for Scientific Integrity, dedicated to tracking and reporting retractions of scientific papers. It serves as a watchdog for research integrity, documenting cases where published studies are withdrawn due to errors, misconduct, or other issues.
Sources: Retraction Watch official site
Retraction Watch has moderate AI-search visibility, scoring 68/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 75, trust 44, recommendation 85). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Retraction Watch official site
Retraction Watch was founded in 2012. Retraction Watch operates in the Media & Entertainment category. It is analyzed by Brand Analyzer across seven brand dimensions and AI-search visibility.
Sources: Wikidata
Retraction Watch monitors scientific literature for retractions, corrections, and expressions of concern, compiling this information into a searchable database. It also publishes news articles and investigative reports examining the reasons behind specific retractions, trends in research misconduct, and broader issues affecting the integrity of scientific publishing.
Sources: Retraction Watch official site
Retraction Watch scores 85/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is reasonably likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Media & Entertainment options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority; a Wikipedia presence helps.
Sources: Retraction Watch official site
Retraction Watch is best known for maintaining one of the most comprehensive public databases of scientific paper retractions and for its investigative journalism uncovering cases of research misconduct, fraud, and publishing errors across academic disciplines.
Sources: Retraction Watch official site
Retraction Watch can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Retraction Watch official site
Retraction Watch is used by researchers, academics, journalists, publishers, and members of the public who are interested in monitoring scientific integrity, verifying the status of published research, or investigating cases of misconduct or error in academic literature.
Sources: Retraction Watch official site
Retraction Watch is owned by or part of Center for Scientific Integrity. Retraction Watch operates in the Media & Entertainment category.
Sources: Wikidata
Retraction Watch is popular because it fills a unique niche by systematically tracking scientific retractions, providing transparency that is often difficult to find through publishers or journals directly. Its combination of a searchable database and investigative reporting makes it a valuable resource for researchers, journalists, and the public concerned about scientific accountability.
Sources: Retraction Watch official site
Retraction Watch scores 68/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Retraction Watch has a moderate AI-visibility profile at 68/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (85/100) and its weakest is trust (44/100). It benefits from a recognised Wikipedia company entity, a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry and a global traffic rank of #43,780 (Tranco). The main gaps holding it back: thin schema.org structured data and no llms.txt to steer AI to its best pages. In a live check, Claude could already identify Retraction Watch from memory (September 2026) - a sign these signals are paying off.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to Retraction Watch: Retail Week (87/100), RedState (87/100), Reveal (87/100), Road & Track (87/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Yr (91/100), Yamaha Corporation (91/100).
Category leader: Complex (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.