Userscripts.org Brand Score: 59/100 - Developing tier

Power-ups for your browser

Userscripts.org (userscripts-mirror.org) scores 59 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Developing tier among Technology brands, SaaS brands, Other brands, in the 6th percentile of 37003 Technology brands.

AI Snapshot

Userscripts.org, founded in 2005, was a website that hosted a large repository of free, community-created JavaScript userscripts. These scripts allowed users to customize and enhance the functionality of websites they already visited, typically through browser extensions such as Greasemonkey for Mozilla Firefox. The site served as a central hub for tech-savvy internet users and developers to find, share, and download userscripts tailored to specific sites, without needing to write their own code from scratch.

Key facts about Userscripts.org

Brand Name	Userscripts.org
Domain	userscripts-mirror.org
Industry	Technology, SaaS
Founded	2005
Main Competitors	Greasy Fork (80/100), OpenUserJS (67/100), Tampermonkey (79/100), Violentmonkey, Userstyles.org (83/100)

Evidence

Moz Domain Authority 50/100 vs category average 40 / leader 100 - a strong backlink profile, so AI systems frequently encounter mentions of the brand.

Ranked #420,135 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - modest traffic makes the brand easy for AI models to overlook.

Userscripts.org appears on Wikipedia but without a dedicated company entity, so AI models can confuse it with similarly named subjects.

The homepage meta description reads "Thousands of userscripts to enhance your browsing experience" (Meta description: 8 words. No OG description (falling back to meta)) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.

Structured data on the homepage: No structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.

AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.

Detected tech stack: Cloudflare.

Social footprint: verified profiles on Facebook, Instagram; no detected presence on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, YouTube, GitHub - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.

0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.

Does AI know Userscripts.org?

Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked September 2026.

When asked "What is Userscripts.org?", Claude could identify the brand as of September 2026. Userscripts.org was a popular repository where users could find and share Greasemonkey/Tampermonkey scripts to customize and enhance websites, until the original site shut down in 2012. Userscripts-mirror.org is a community-run mirror that preserves an archive of those scripts af Best known for hosting a large community-driven library of browser userscripts for customizing websites.

When asked "Best brands similar to Userscripts.org?", Claude would not surface Userscripts.org as of September 2026. It's a legacy archive of a defunct site rather than an active service, so I wouldn't recommend it over current script repositories like Greasy Fork.

People Also Ask About Userscripts.org

Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.

Who are Userscripts.org's main competitors?

Userscripts.org's main competitors in Technology: Greasy Fork (80/100), OpenUserJS (67/100), Tampermonkey (79/100), Userstyles.org (83/100).

Sources: Brand Analyzer scan

How visible is Userscripts.org in AI search?

Userscripts.org has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 37/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 40, trust 26, recommendation 45). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.

Sources: Userscripts.org official site

When was Userscripts.org founded?

Userscripts.org was founded in 2005. Userscripts.org operates in the Technology category. It is analyzed by Brand Analyzer across seven brand dimensions and AI-search visibility.

Sources: Wikidata

Does ChatGPT recommend Userscripts.org?

Userscripts.org scores 45/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Technology options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority; a Wikipedia presence helps.

Sources: Userscripts.org official site

How can Userscripts.org improve its AI discoverability?

Userscripts.org can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.

Sources: Userscripts.org official site

What is Userscripts.org?

Userscripts.org was a website, founded in 2005, that functioned as a repository for thousands of free, community-created JavaScript userscripts. It was associated with the Mozilla Firefox extension ecosystem, providing scripts that users could install to modify and enhance the behavior of other websites.

Sources: Userscripts.org official site

What does Userscripts.org do?

Userscripts.org hosted and distributed a large library of free userscripts-small JavaScript programs-that users could install via browser extensions to customize and improve the functionality of websites they regularly visit. It served as a community-driven platform where developers could upload scripts and users could browse and download them for personalized browsing enhancements.

Sources: Userscripts.org official site

Who uses Userscripts.org?

Userscripts.org was used by tech-savvy internet users, developers, and browser power-users who wanted greater control over and customization of their browsing experience through JavaScript-based enhancements to websites they frequently visited.

Sources: Userscripts.org official site

Recommendations

• Set up professional email - Use your company domain for email (e.g., hello@yourbrand.com) instead of Gmail/Yahoo. This significantly boosts credibility. (impact: high, effort: quick_win)
• Improve meta descriptions for AI - Write clear, concise meta and Open Graph descriptions that answer 'what does this company do?' in 10-30 words. AI systems rely heavily on these to summarize your brand. (impact: high, effort: quick_win)
• Add structured data and Open Graph tags - Add JSON-LD structured data (Organization, FAQ schemas) and complete Open Graph tags (og:title, og:description, og:image, og:type). This helps AI systems and social platforms accurately represent your brand. (impact: high, effort: moderate)
• Establish your social media presence - Create profiles on major platforms (LinkedIn, X, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube) using a consistent handle derived from your brand name. Link to them from your website footer. (impact: medium, effort: quick_win)
• Add custom brand typography - No custom fonts were detected on your website. Choose a heading font and body font using a service like Google Fonts to establish typographic brand identity. (impact: medium, effort: quick_win)

AI visibility

Userscripts.org scores 37/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.

Userscripts.org has a weak AI-visibility profile at 37/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (45/100) and its weakest is trust (26/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry, a global traffic rank of #420,135 (Tranco) and a Moz Domain Authority of 50/100. The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, thin schema.org structured data and no llms.txt to steer AI to its best pages. In a live check, Claude could already identify Userscripts.org from memory (September 2026) - a sign these signals are paying off.

Visibility - 40/100

• Wikipedia presence - 18/40
• Wikidata entity - 17/25
• Web popularity (Tranco) - 5/20
• Reddit visibility - 0/15

Trust - 26/100

• Domain Authority - 15/30
• Backlink trust (spam score) - 7/10
• Schema.org structured data - 0/25
• Knowledge graph anchors (sameAs) - 0/15
• llms.txt convention - 0/10
• Reddit sentiment (heuristic) - 4/10

Recommendation likelihood - 45/100

• robots.txt AI bot permissions - 30/30
• Sitemap.xml presence - 0/10
• Help center / Docs hub - 0/15
• FAQ presence - 0/15
• Category-relative authority - 15/20
• Category leader signals - 0/10

Score breakdown - 7 dimensions

The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.

• Name Quality - 67/100
• Digital Presence - 80/100
• Visual Identity - 70/100
• Messaging Clarity - 95/100
• Trust Foundation - 54/100
• AI Discoverability - 34/100
• Brand Authority - 26/100

Peer brands

Ranked closest to Userscripts.org: Universal Health Services, Inc. (59/100), waifu2x (59/100), VARSUN eTechnologies (59/100), HugeDomains (59/100).

A step up - brands to learn from: Zocket (71/100), Zhangyue (71/100).

Category leader: Hostinger (97/100).

Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.

Add this brand score badge to your site