Justice Reported, Rights Protected
Article 14 (article-14.com) scores 72 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Brand-Ready tier among Media & Entertainment brands, Legal brands, Non-profit brands, in the 29th percentile of 22877 Media & Entertainment brands.
Article 14 is a media outlet focused on investigative journalism covering the legal and justice system. It documents threats to justice, failures within legal systems, and tracks successes that can serve as models for reform. The platform aims to identify broader trends and patterns in justice-related issues and bring them to public attention. Its audience includes citizens, legal professionals, policymakers, journalists, and civil society advocates interested in legal reform and human rights.
| Brand Name | Article 14 |
|---|---|
| Domain | article-14.com |
| Industry | Media & Entertainment, Legal |
| Main Competitors | ProPublica (83/100), The Marshall Project (85/100), The Appeal (82/100), Courthouse News Service (74/100), Injustice Watch (80/100), Law360 (90/100) |
Moz Domain Authority 50/100 vs category average 52 / leader 100 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
Ranked #631,467 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - modest traffic makes the brand easy for AI models to overlook.
Article 14 appears on Wikipedia but without a dedicated company entity, so AI models can confuse it with similarly named subjects.
The homepage meta description reads "Article 14 addresses threats to and failures of justice and deficiencies in the legal system, tracks successes that can be built upon and discerns trends and patterns that require …" (Meta description: 37 words. OG description present and descriptive) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: og:title, og:description, og:image, Twitter cards. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: Nginx.
Social footprint: verified profiles on Instagram, GitHub; no detected presence on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.
When asked "What is Article 14?", Claude could not identify the brand as of October 2026. I don't recognize a Media & Entertainment company called "Article 14" at article-14.com, which likely means it's a small, niche, or newer venture without much presence in my training data.
When asked "Best brands similar to Article 14?", Claude would not surface Article 14 as of October 2026. I can't recommend it since I don't have verified knowledge of what it actually does or how it compares to others in the space.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Article 14's main competitors in Media & Entertainment: ProPublica (83/100), The Marshall Project (85/100), The Appeal (82/100), Courthouse News Service (74/100), Injustice Watch (80/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
Article 14 has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 34/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 36, trust 19, recommendation 50). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Article 14 official site
Article 14 scores 50/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is reasonably likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Media & Entertainment options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority; a Wikipedia presence helps.
Sources: Article 14 official site
Article 14 can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Article 14 official site
Article 14 is a media and journalism outlet dedicated to covering issues within the legal and justice system. It focuses on exposing failures, threats, and successes within legal institutions, aiming to inform the public, policymakers, and legal professionals about critical justice-related developments.
Sources: Article 14 official site
Article 14 conducts investigative journalism centered on the legal and justice system. It identifies and reports on threats to justice, documents failures within legal institutions, and highlights successful reforms or outcomes that could serve as models. The outlet also works to detect broader trends and patterns in justice issues that merit public attention.
Sources: Article 14 official site
Article 14 scores 34/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Article 14 has a weak AI-visibility profile at 34/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (50/100) and its weakest is trust (19/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry, a global traffic rank of #631,467 (Tranco) and a Moz Domain Authority of 50/100. The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, thin schema.org structured data and no llms.txt to steer AI to its best pages. In a live check (October 2026), Claude could not identify Article 14 from memory, confirming the gaps above.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to Article 14: Artefakt (72/100), Association for Recorded Sound Collections (ARSC) (72/100), MeriStation (72/100), Asking Alexandria (72/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Zoom (81/100), Zeno Group (81/100).
Category leader: Change.org (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.