Volunteer, Participate, or Donate
CDF (cdf.coop) scores 77 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Brand-Ready tier among Non-profit brands, Finance brands, Other brands, in the 56th percentile of 16150 Non-profit brands.
CDF (cdf.coop) is a U.S.-based non-profit organization focused on advancing cooperative economics. It works to cultivate cooperative leaders, strengthen the national co-op support system, and demonstrate how cooperative economies can build shared wealth and community resilience. CDF engages volunteers, donors, and cooperative organizations to help communities address needs, pursue aspirations, and thrive together through cooperative models.
| Brand Name | CDF |
|---|---|
| Domain | cdf.coop |
| Industry | Non-profit, Finance |
| Main Competitors | NCBA CLUSA (79/100), Cooperative Development Institute (75/100), Shared Capital Cooperative (73/100), National Cooperative Bank (79/100), The Democracy Collaborative (82/100) |
Moz Domain Authority 35/100 vs category average 49 / leader 95 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
CDF appears on Wikipedia but without a dedicated company entity, so AI models can confuse it with similarly named subjects.
The homepage meta description reads "Volunteer, Participate, or Donate" (Meta description too short (4 words). OG description present but brief) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: og:title, og:description. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: Wix.
Social footprint: verified profiles on X (Twitter), Instagram, GitHub; no detected presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.
When asked "What is CDF?", Claude could not identify the brand as of October 2026. I don't recognize this specific organization, likely because "CDF" is a common acronym used by many small non-profits and cooperatives, and this particular one with the cdf.coop domain doesn't match any entity I have reliable information on.
When asked "Best brands similar to CDF?", Claude would not surface CDF as of October 2026. I can't vouch for or recommend an organization I can't confidently identify.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
CDF's main competitors in Non-profit: NCBA CLUSA (79/100), Cooperative Development Institute (75/100), Shared Capital Cooperative (73/100), National Cooperative Bank (79/100), The Democracy Collaborative (82/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
CDF has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 37/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 35, trust 32, recommendation 45). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: CDF official site
CDF scores 45/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Non-profit options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority; a Wikipedia presence helps.
Sources: CDF official site
CDF can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: CDF official site
CDF scores 37/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
CDF has a weak AI-visibility profile at 37/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (45/100) and its weakest is trust (32/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, a low Moz Domain Authority of 35/100 and thin schema.org structured data. In a live check (October 2026), Claude could not identify CDF from memory, confirming the gaps above.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to CDF: Catholic Community Services of Western Washington (77/100), Canadian Collegiate Athletic Association (CCAA) (77/100), Church Divinity School of the Pacific (77/100), CEPS (77/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Zero Project (81/100), Youth Villages (81/100).
Category leader: Change.org (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.