Wij zien u.
Charim (charim.nl) scores 74 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Brand-Ready tier among Healthcare brands, Non-profit brands, in the 38th percentile of 15354 Healthcare brands.
Charim is a Dutch healthcare and non-profit organization that provides personal care and support to people such as the elderly and those with dementia. Its services are delivered in various settings, including at dedicated locations, in clients' own homes, or within the local community. Charim's approach centers on tailoring support to each individual's personal needs, wishes, and what matters most to them in their daily lives, rather than offering a one-size-fits-all care model.
| Brand Name | Charim |
|---|---|
| Domain | charim.nl |
| Industry | Healthcare, Non-profit |
| Main Competitors | Vivium Zorggroep (78/100), Zorgspectrum, Amaris Zorggroep (73/100), Opella (75/100), Sensire (77/100), De Wever, Vitras |
Moz Domain Authority 15/100 vs category average 41 / leader 95 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "Charim biedt ondersteuning en zorg die aansluit bij wat voor mensen echt van betekenis is." (No meta description) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: og:title, Twitter cards, canonical. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Content is NL-only, limiting citation in English-language AI answers.
Detected tech stack: Vue.
Social footprint: verified profiles on Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, GitHub - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.
When asked "What is Charim?", Claude could not identify the brand as of October 2026. I don't recognize Charim (charim.nl) as a specific company in the healthcare space, possibly because it's a small or regional Dutch organization without much presence in my training data.
When asked "Best brands similar to Charim?", Claude would not surface Charim as of October 2026. I can't recommend a company I don't have verified information about.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Charim's main competitors in Healthcare: Vivium Zorggroep (78/100), Amaris Zorggroep (73/100), Opella (75/100), Sensire (77/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
Charim has low AI-search visibility, scoring 19/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 15, trust 7, recommendation 42). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Charim official site
Charim scores 42/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Healthcare options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: Charim official site
Charim can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Charim official site
Charim scores 19/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Charim has a weak AI-visibility profile at 19/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (42/100) and its weakest is trust (7/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, a low Moz Domain Authority of 15/100 and thin schema.org structured data. In a live check (October 2026), Claude could not identify Charim from memory, confirming the gaps above.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to Charim: Chapel Haven Schleifer Center (CHSC) (74/100), Chai Discovery (74/100), Chemify (74/100), Chemonics International (74/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Zymo Research (81/100), Zurich Insurance Group (81/100).
Category leader: Booksy (96/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.