Historical Myths Relished and Ruined
Our Fake History (ourfakehistory.com) scores 66 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Developing tier among Media & Entertainment brands, Education brands, in the 14th percentile of 34987 Media & Entertainment brands.
Our Fake History is a podcast that explores and questions popular historical myths and legends, examining where myth and history intersect. Through deeply researched, narrative-driven episodes, it separates documented fact from popular legend across various historical topics. The show is aimed at history enthusiasts and curious listeners who enjoy engaging storytelling combined with critical analysis of commonly held beliefs about the past.
| Brand Name | Our Fake History |
|---|---|
| Domain | ourfakehistory.com |
| Industry | Media & Entertainment, Education |
| Main Competitors | Hardcore History (78/100), Stuff You Missed in History Class (72/100), The History Extra Podcast (86/100), You're Wrong About, Lore (81/100), The Rest Is History |
Moz Domain Authority 35/100 vs category average 50 / leader 100 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "To explore and question the myths we think are history and the history that might be hidden in myths." (No meta description) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: canonical. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: Nginx, WordPress, Ghost.
Social footprint: verified profiles on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram; no detected presence on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, GitHub - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.
When asked "What is Our Fake History?", Claude could identify the brand as of October 2026. Our Fake History is a podcast hosted by Sebastian Major that digs into historical myths, legends, and popular stories to separate fact from fiction, covering topics like pirates, ancient myths, and urban legends about history. Best known for A history podcast that investigates and debunks or verifies popular historical myths and legends.
When asked "Best brands similar to Our Fake History?", Claude would recommend Our Fake History as of October 2026. It's a well-regarded, long-running podcast in the history/myth-busting niche, so I'd mention it if someone wanted podcasts similar to Dan Carlin's Hardcore History or other popular history shows.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Our Fake History's main competitors in Media & Entertainment: Hardcore History (78/100), Stuff You Missed in History Class (72/100), The History Extra Podcast (86/100), Lore (81/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
Our Fake History offers podcast episodes as its primary product, each focused on dissecting a specific historical myth or legend through researched analysis and storytelling.
Sources: Our Fake History official site
Our Fake History is a podcast dedicated to exploring and questioning myths that are often mistaken for history, as well as uncovering historical truths that may be hidden within myths and legends.
Sources: Our Fake History official site
Our Fake History has low AI-search visibility, scoring 20/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 13, trust 12, recommendation 42). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Our Fake History official site
Our Fake History scores 42/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Media & Entertainment options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: Our Fake History official site
Our Fake History is known for examining well-known historical myths and legends, combining thorough research with narrative storytelling to question commonly accepted versions of historical events.
Sources: Our Fake History official site
Our Fake History can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Our Fake History official site
Our Fake History is used by history enthusiasts, regular podcast listeners, and curious individuals interested in learning the truth behind popular historical myths and legends.
Sources: Our Fake History official site
Our Fake History scores 20/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Our Fake History has a weak AI-visibility profile at 20/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (42/100) and its weakest is trust (12/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, a low Moz Domain Authority of 35/100 and thin schema.org structured data. In a live check, Claude could already identify Our Fake History from memory (October 2026) - a sign these signals are paying off.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to Our Fake History: Otto Nemenz International (66/100), Ossian H-Music Shop (66/100), R.M. Williams OUTBACK Magazine (66/100), OwnLocal (66/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Ziyouz (71/100), Zishy (71/100).
Category leader: Change.org (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.