Producing digital media worldwide
Times Publishing (timespublishing.com) scores 62 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Developing tier among Media & Entertainment brands, Marketing & Advertising brands, in the 8th percentile of 27987 Media & Entertainment brands.
Times Publishing is a producer and publisher of digital and online media content for businesses and creators. The company states it has maintained an online presence for 18 years and has built a registered fanbase of over 5 million across platforms including YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and X. It positions itself as an established, trusted media producer that provides content and resources to help businesses and creators grow their digital presence. Its focus spans the media & entertainment and marketing & advertising categories.
| Brand Name | Times Publishing |
|---|---|
| Domain | timespublishing.com |
| Industry | Media & Entertainment, Marketing & Advertising |
| Main Competitors | BBTV (BroadbandTV) (76/100), Studio71 (84/100), Jukin Media (83/100), Fullscreen, Night Media (71/100), Machinima (58/100) |
Moz Domain Authority 9/100 vs category average 51 / leader 100 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
Ranked #3,138,210 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - modest traffic makes the brand easy for AI models to overlook.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "Producers and Publishers of digital, and online media." (Meta description: 8 words. OG description present and descriptive) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: 1 JSON-LD block(s), Breadcrumb/Website schema, og:title, og:description, og:image, og:type, Twitter cards, canonical. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: Cloudflare, WordPress, Ghost.
Social footprint: verified profiles on X (Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, YouTube; no detected presence on LinkedIn, GitHub - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.
When asked "What is Times Publishing?", Claude could not identify the brand as of October 2026. I don't have reliable, specific information about this exact company at timespublishing.com, likely because "Times Publishing" is a fairly generic name used by multiple unrelated publishing or media businesses, making it hard to pin down which one this refers to.
When asked "Best brands similar to Times Publishing?", Claude would not surface Times Publishing as of October 2026. Since I can't confidently identify the specific company or verify its reputation, I wouldn't bring it up as a recommendation.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Times Publishing's main competitors in Media & Entertainment: BBTV (BroadbandTV) (76/100), Studio71 (84/100), Jukin Media (83/100), Night Media (71/100), Machinima (58/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
Times Publishing has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 30/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 23, trust 28, recommendation 45). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Times Publishing official site
Times Publishing scores 45/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Media & Entertainment options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: Times Publishing official site
Times Publishing can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Times Publishing official site
Times Publishing scores 30/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Times Publishing has a weak AI-visibility profile at 30/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (45/100) and its weakest is visibility (23/100). It benefits from a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry, a global traffic rank of #3,138,210 (Tranco) and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, a low Moz Domain Authority of 9/100 and thin schema.org structured data. In a live check (October 2026), Claude could not identify Times Publishing from memory, confirming the gaps above.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to Times Publishing: Victoria Times Colonist (62/100), The Six Billion Dollar Man (62/100), Odido (62/100), Tokyo National Museum (62/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Ziyouz (71/100), Zishy (71/100).
Category leader: Change.org (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.