Exploring history through historic photos
WhatWasThere (whatwasthere.com) scores 69 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Developing tier among Media & Entertainment brands, Education brands, in the 19th percentile of 21066 Media & Entertainment brands.
WhatWasThere was an online platform that allowed users to discover and visualize historical photographs overlaid on real-world locations via interactive maps. It provided an educational and interactive way to see how places looked in the past, geolocating historic imagery for exploration. The platform was aimed at history enthusiasts, educators, students, and institutions interested in historic imagery. It is now defunct, but it was once positioned as a unique tool for historical photo discovery and location-based storytelling within the Media & Entertainment and Education categories.
| Brand Name | WhatWasThere |
|---|---|
| Domain | whatwasthere.com |
| Industry | Media & Entertainment, Education |
| Main Competitors | Historypin (79/100), Google Earth, Mapillary, New York Public Library Digital Collections, David Rumsey Map Collection |
Moz Domain Authority 53/100 vs category average 53 / leader 100 - a strong backlink profile, so AI systems frequently encounter mentions of the brand.
Ranked #1,502,340 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - modest traffic makes the brand easy for AI models to overlook.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "To help people discover and visualize historical photographs overlaid on real-world locations." (No meta description) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: 1 JSON-LD block(s), Breadcrumb/Website schema, og:title, og:type, Twitter cards, canonical. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: Wix, React.
Social footprint: verified profiles on X (Twitter), Instagram, YouTube; no detected presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, GitHub - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked September 2026.
When asked "What is WhatWasThere?", Claude could identify the brand as of September 2026. WhatWasThere is a platform and mobile app that lets users browse historical photographs geographically pinned to a map, and even overlay old photos onto live camera views of the same location today to see how a place has changed over time. Best known for Its map-based, crowd-sourced historical photo overlay feature that shows how specific locations looked in the past versus present.
When asked "Best brands similar to WhatWasThere?", Claude would recommend WhatWasThere as of September 2026. It's a distinctive niche tool for location-based historical photography that would fit naturally in a discussion of apps blending history, maps, and augmented reality.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
WhatWasThere has limited AI-search visibility, scoring 28/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 0, trust 50, recommendation 50). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: WhatWasThere official site
WhatWasThere scores 50/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is reasonably likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Media & Entertainment options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: WhatWasThere official site
WhatWasThere was a now-defunct online platform designed to help people discover and visualize historical photographs overlaid on real-world locations. It combined historic imagery with interactive mapping technology, allowing users to see how specific places appeared in the past compared to the present.
Sources: WhatWasThere official site
WhatWasThere allowed users to explore historic photographs that were geolocated on interactive maps. By overlaying old images onto real-world locations, it enabled users to visually compare past and present views of the same place, creating an interactive and educational experience for historical discovery.
Sources: WhatWasThere official site
WhatWasThere can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: WhatWasThere official site
WhatWasThere offered a platform for exploring historic photographs geolocated on interactive maps, allowing users to view and compare historical images of specific locations. It served as a tool for historical photo discovery, visualization, and location-based storytelling.
Sources: WhatWasThere official site
WhatWasThere was used by history enthusiasts, educators, students, and institutions interested in exploring and preserving historic imagery, particularly those seeking an interactive way to understand how specific locations have changed over time.
Sources: WhatWasThere official site
WhatWasThere was known for its unique approach to historical photo discovery, combining geolocation technology with historic imagery so users could view old photographs mapped onto the exact locations where they were taken, offering a visual timeline of place-based history.
Sources: WhatWasThere official site
WhatWasThere scores 28/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
WhatWasThere has a weak AI-visibility profile at 28/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is trust (50/100) and its weakest is visibility (0/100). It benefits from a global traffic rank of #1,502,340 (Tranco), a Moz Domain Authority of 53/100 and open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, no strong Wikidata entry and thin schema.org structured data. In a live check, Claude could already identify WhatWasThere from memory (September 2026) - a sign these signals are paying off.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to WhatWasThere: Wexler Gallery (69/100), Webthethao (69/100), Whitman Publishing (69/100), Wide Days (69/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Ziyouz (71/100), Ziggo GO (71/100).
Category leader: Change.org (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.