Recording every violent death since 2003
Iraq Body Count (iraqbodycount.org) scores 77 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Brand-Ready tier among Non-profit brands, Media & Entertainment brands, Government brands, in the 50th percentile of 9422 Non-profit brands.
Iraq Body Count is a nonprofit project that maintains what it describes as the world's largest public database documenting violent civilian and combatant deaths resulting from the 2003 invasion of Iraq. It compiles and cross-checks data from media reports, hospitals, morgues, NGOs, and official records. The project positions itself as an independent, evidence-based resource used by researchers, journalists, human rights organizations, and policymakers seeking verified conflict casualty data.
| Brand Name | Iraq Body Count |
|---|---|
| Domain | iraqbodycount.org |
| Industry | Non-profit, Media & Entertainment |
| Main Competitors | Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) (88/100), Uppsala Conflict Data Program, Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, Airwars (83/100), Human Rights Watch (90/100), Amnesty International (93/100) |
Moz Domain Authority 65/100 vs category average 51 / leader 95 - a strong backlink profile, so AI systems frequently encounter mentions of the brand.
Ranked #121,308 on the Tranco list of most-visited sites - modest traffic makes the brand easy for AI models to overlook.
Iraq Body Count has a dedicated Wikipedia entity - a top-weighted signal AI models rely on to identify and describe the brand.
The homepage meta description reads "To maintain the world's largest public database documenting violent civilian and combatant deaths resulting from the 2003 invasion of Iraq." (No meta description) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: No structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: robots.txt present, no AI bot restrictions - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Detected tech stack: Apache.
Social footprint: verified profiles on X (Twitter), Instagram, YouTube; no detected presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, GitHub - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked September 2026.
When asked "What is Iraq Body Count?", Claude could identify the brand as of September 2026. Iraq Body Count is an independent project that has tracked and documented civilian deaths resulting from the 2003 Iraq invasion and subsequent violence, using cross-referenced media reports, hospital, morgue, and NGO data. It maintains one of the most cited public databases of Ir Best known for Maintaining a detailed public database tracking civilian deaths in the Iraq war.
When asked "Best brands similar to Iraq Body Count?", Claude would recommend Iraq Body Count as of September 2026. It's a widely cited, credible source for conflict casualty data and would come up naturally in discussions of war monitoring or human cost documentation organizations.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Iraq Body Count's main competitors in Non-profit: Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) (88/100), Airwars (83/100), Human Rights Watch (90/100), Amnesty International (93/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
Iraq Body Count offers a publicly accessible database documenting violent civilian and combatant deaths related to the 2003 Iraq invasion. The database compiles and cross-references data from media reports, hospital records, morgue data, NGO documentation, and official sources, providing detailed, verifiable records for research, journalism, and human rights advocacy.
Sources: Iraq Body Count official site
Iraq Body Count is a nonprofit organization that maintains a public database documenting violent civilian and combatant deaths resulting from the 2003 invasion of Iraq. It is described as the world's largest such public database, compiling records from multiple independent sources to provide a verified account of deaths connected to the conflict.
Sources: Iraq Body Count official site
Iraq Body Count has moderate AI-search visibility, scoring 51/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 62, trust 37, recommendation 48). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Iraq Body Count official site
Iraq Body Count scores 48/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Non-profit options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority; a Wikipedia presence helps.
Sources: Iraq Body Count official site
Iraq Body Count is known for maintaining what it describes as the world's largest public database of violent deaths connected to the 2003 Iraq invasion. It is recognized for its methodology of cross-checking multiple independent sources, including media, hospitals, morgues, NGOs, and official records, to compile a transparent and verifiable record of casualties.
Sources: Iraq Body Count official site
Iraq Body Count can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Iraq Body Count official site
Iraq Body Count's database is used by researchers, journalists, human rights organizations, policymakers, and members of the general public seeking verified data on civilian and combatant deaths connected to the Iraq conflict. These users rely on the database for evidence-based reporting, academic research, and advocacy work.
Sources: Iraq Body Count official site
Iraq Body Count is widely referenced because it offers a large, publicly accessible, and methodically cross-checked database of violent deaths from the 2003 Iraq invasion. Its scale and transparency make it a go-to resource for researchers, journalists, human rights organizations, and policymakers who need documented, source-verified casualty data rather than estimates or projections.
Sources: Iraq Body Count official site
Iraq Body Count scores 51/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Iraq Body Count has a limited AI-visibility profile at 51/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is visibility (62/100) and its weakest is trust (37/100). It benefits from a recognised Wikipedia company entity, a Wikidata knowledge-graph entry and a global traffic rank of #121,308 (Tranco). The main gaps holding it back: thin schema.org structured data and no llms.txt to steer AI to its best pages. In a live check, Claude could already identify Iraq Body Count from memory (September 2026) - a sign these signals are paying off.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to Iraq Body Count: IOIC (Institute of Internal Communication) (77/100), International Publishers Association (77/100), International Studies Association (ISA) (77/100), iTelescope (77/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: Youth Villages (81/100), Youth Ki Awaaz (81/100).
Category leader: Change.org (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.