Connecting talent with causes
Civil Society Jobs (civilsocietyjobs.co.uk) scores 43 out of 100 on Brand Analyzer, placing it in the Early Stage tier among Non-profit brands, in the 0th percentile of 22084 Non-profit brands.
Civil Society Jobs (civilsocietyjobs.co.uk) is described as a niche job board dedicated to the charity and non-profit sector in the UK. Its stated mission is to help civil society organizations find talent to advance their missions, connecting job seekers with employers in charities, non-profits, and civil society organizations. However, the site's description also notes the domain is currently parked free of charge courtesy of 123 Reg, suggesting it may not be actively operating as a live job board at this time.
| Brand Name | Civil Society Jobs |
|---|---|
| Domain | civilsocietyjobs.co.uk |
| Industry | Non-profit |
| Main Competitors | Charity Job (86/100), Third Sector Jobs, Guardian Jobs, CharityJob (86/100), NCVO Jobs (85/100), Indeed (87/100) |
Moz Domain Authority 16/100 vs category average 47 / leader 98 - limited third-party links, so AI systems rarely encounter mentions of the brand.
No Wikipedia presence was found - a major gap, since Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in AI training data.
The homepage meta description reads "is parked free, courtesy of 123 Reg." (Meta description: 7 words. OG description present but brief) - this is the summary AI engines are most likely to quote.
Structured data on the homepage: og:title, og:description. Adding Organization and FAQ schema would further help AI crawlers parse the brand's identity.
AI-crawler access: No robots.txt found (default: all bots allowed, but explicit file preferred) - robots.txt controls whether engines like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can read the site at all.
Social footprint: verified profiles on Facebook, Instagram; no detected presence on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, YouTube, GitHub - consistent profiles reinforce the brand's identity across the web.
0 Reddit mentions - community discussion signals real-world reputation to AI models.
Live results from asking a general-purpose AI assistant about the brand, checked October 2026.
When asked "What is Civil Society Jobs?", Claude could not identify the brand as of October 2026. I don't have specific knowledge of Civil Society Jobs at civilsocietyjobs.co.uk, likely because it's a niche UK job board for the non-profit/charity sector that wouldn't have extensive coverage in my training data.
When asked "Best brands similar to Civil Society Jobs?", Claude would not surface Civil Society Jobs as of October 2026. I can't vouch for specifics I don't actually recognize, so I wouldn't want to recommend it without genuine knowledge of its reputation or service quality.
Common questions people ask in Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI search engines.
Civil Society Jobs's main competitors in Non-profit: Charity Job (86/100), CharityJob (86/100), NCVO Jobs (85/100), Indeed (87/100).
Sources: Brand Analyzer scan
Civil Society Jobs has low AI-search visibility, scoring 8/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI visibility composite (visibility 0, trust 7, recommendation 24). This estimates how likely AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are to know, trust, and recommend the brand.
Sources: Civil Society Jobs official site
Civil Society Jobs scores 24/100 on Brand Analyzer's AI recommendation signal, indicating it is less likely to be surfaced when AI assistants like ChatGPT suggest Non-profit options. Recommendation depends on crawlability, structured data, and category authority.
Sources: Civil Society Jobs official site
Civil Society Jobs can improve AI discoverability by strengthening structured data (Organization and FAQ schema), maintaining an accurate Wikipedia/Wikidata entity, earning authoritative citations, and keeping content crawlable for AI bots. Brand Analyzer measures these as visibility, trust, and recommendation signals.
Sources: Civil Society Jobs official site
Civil Society Jobs scores 8/100 for AI visibility - how well ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can discover, identify and cite the brand.
Civil Society Jobs has a weak AI-visibility profile at 8/100 - a proxy for how readily ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews can recognise and cite it. Its strongest area is recommendation likelihood (24/100) and its weakest is visibility (0/100). It benefits from open access for AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.). The main gaps holding it back: no clear Wikipedia entity to anchor it in LLM training data, no strong Wikidata entry and a low Moz Domain Authority of 16/100. In a live check (October 2026), Claude could not identify Civil Society Jobs from memory, confirming the gaps above.
The score combines seven dimensions - name quality, digital presence, visual identity, messaging clarity, trust foundation, AI discoverability, and brand authority - into a single objective benchmark.
Ranked closest to Civil Society Jobs: Americans for the Arts (43/100), Words After War (44/100), EUCYS (European Union Contest for Young Scientists) (43/100), Forest Park Chamber of Commerce & Development (43/100).
A step up - brands to learn from: ZDK Gesellschaft Demokratische Kultur gGmbH (56/100), PLANETARY (56/100).
Category leader: Change.org (97/100).
Brand Analyzer is built by DataEase AI. Track your brand in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.